LitCritShit & PoliticalTheory & MoralPhilosophy & EroticInvestigation & ScientificElucidation & HonestDialog & RealStories & HistoricalMemory & WhotheFuckKnowsWhatAllElse
My Wild Little Girl Gets in Some Trouble
Published on April 21, 2004 By 6969jimbo6969 In Politics

Rise Up Children, Your Parents Will Follow
THE PRISON SYSTEM, THE SCHOOL SYSTEM, THE WHOLE FUCKING SOCIAL SYSTEM IS ROTTEN


This is not the BLOGessay I intended to post. I had a series of four environmental issues and environmental heroes pieces all planned out surrounding Earth Day tomorrow. I nearly posted a similar piece, as this has turned out to be, last week, about unfortunately typical vicious stupidity in Alabama’s schools, as usual promulgated by the State. A Birmingham ‘alternative’ high school saw fit to steal cell phones from over a hundred students, who were minding their own business but breaking a State statute disallowing “ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES” from school grounds. And, thank GOD! fifty or so parents got angry enough about this perfidious brain-dead behavior to demand an accounting. I’m telling you, people will rise up against the BullShit just as likely when the stakes are small as when the issues are huge.

I’ll write more about this when I’ve had a chance to be in communication with some of my Birmingham compadres---a piece about the murderous madness advanced in the name of national security in Anniston was going to be my Alabama entry for the week; it will wait until the morrow. When I saw, Sunday or Monday in the “Times,” that Columbia’s Grad Students intended to strike, along with Ph.d. candidates at half-a-dozen other elitish colleges---where they perform most of the teaching duties but end up paying for it instead of receiving compensation much of the time---that also nearly impelled me to bring forth the B’ham piece, with a different twist. I have a friend about to embark on the long grind at Columbia, either for a Ph.d. in sociology or an MPH; and I teach a motley combination of the college bound, the already-enrolled but textually challenged, and so on. But again I demurred from this inclination.

Today, however, my very own children presented me with irresistible impetus to consider this issue of power and human rights and schooling and education in the context of America coming to pieces and everyone in a bad state of denial about it except the young and the poor, who are about to blow up at the ‘mainstream’ putrefaction that passes for contemplation and analysis about our current pass. Education is an inevitable topic of interest, in that I teach a hundred or so youngsters, primarily Asian American, mostly ESL. Also, my very own precious little gems are in middle school, at that most insane and insanely vulnerable of ages.

I had just finished a report about the Citizen Panel Project(SEE the “Citizen Science Democracy Network” post from a couple weeks back)for a couple of colleagues when I got a call from an unknown number on my cell. It was my daughter. My immediate thought was, “I’ve forgotten another fucking orthodontist appointment!” But no, those always are Mondays, to facilitate my assistance with the toll of that process, toward which I could otherwise afford very little contribution.

“Daddy?” I was spacing, and this sort of call was highly unusual---only the second time. Freak-out or time-for-pride? “A couple of friends and I?” Freak-out, definitely trouble anyway. “We’re in the principal’s office? Cause we wore our dresses too short?” I can’t help myself, I still find the tendency of ‘Valley-Girl’ speak to make everything a question pretty cool. “Daddy?”

I remained silent, lost in several competing thoughts: one of which was that I was going to have to write about this; one of which was relief; one of which was whether my advice had had any impact, about rape and mayhem sometimes coming to girls with a pretense of “tough” and salacious plastered all over the surface; one of which was a memory almost exactly thirty four years old. I stood in front of the podium in Thomas Jefferson’s auditorium, about to deliver a speech, my nerdy-boy longshot race for Student Council President on the line.

I made a presentation that so electrified the crowd, about color equity, student power, and democracy, all wrapped around our right to rid the halls of the noxious, arbitrary, and stupid dress code, that the ovation lasted for five minutes, our staid and stolidly staunch former-coach- principal a shaken man as he tried to quiet the mob that had come to its feet. I swear to God, it could have been exactly thirty-four years ago, definitely a Spring day in 1970, the very notion of the correspondence appealing to my proclivities to produce promising premises about random conjunctions. “Daddy, are you still there?”

“Yeah hon. What do you need?” Again, I can’t help myself, my first inclination is to see what I can do, rather than be stern or tough or whatever else a ‘good’ parent might offer.

She tittered into the phone. “They say we have to get new clothes.” Little Casey, who IS tough, proceeded to launch into detailed descriptions of all the outfits she needed me to retrieve. ‘What?’ I thought. ‘All these young women are my daughter’s diminutive size?’ But my cortex kicked in as well, and I noted I was working, that I could only make the journey when I found an opportune moment to slip away, that this was inconvenient, all the while trying to picture just how slutty in dress and demeanor were my little girl and her friends on a sunny warm Southern Appalachian Wednesday. The quiet laughter continued as I pontificated.

“Listen, you! This is no laughing matter. Breaking the rules has consequences.” The laughter stopped, and a sober eleven year old spoke, not only for my benefit but for another, silent, watcher at her end of the line. “I know it’s ‘no laughing matter.’ PLEASE, daddy!”

She had told me to use the spare key to get into their beautiful new home. Stories geyser to the surface as I think about my ex and her husband and my children and their new life, which grew out of the crazy coming together of me and their lion-hearted mother, our joining about as unlikely as any possible configuration of Montague and Capulet imagineable. All of this will spill out, given time enough and tide. But not today, obviously.

I told my Executive Director, for one vector of writing projects I manage and assist, about the deal, and he growled fiercely, as is his wont. But his logic was impeccable when he asked, finally, “What ya gonna do?” and let me go.

Their mom had told me of one such trek, when my son had the temerity, definitely more pointedly than appropriate given his age and her lack of brainpower, to insult his English teacher’s choice of George Bush for President. “It’s just like when you were ten!” And my pounding heart definitely thundered away when I came up to the school. The trouble is, I had no experience of this sort of thing, but for the bizarre forgery incident in sixth grade, just after I had moved to Texas(more later), and I hadn’t done anything then, so I was much more akin, in the event, to Billy Budd than to Tom Sawyer or Becky Thatcher.

I have, of late, through no special virtue or course of work on my part, somehow come to a very peaceful and powerful place in my life. Thundering cardiology notwithstanding, I knew I would remain equable, that I would be firm but open with my child, that I would ask for documentation from the authorities. I parked in the Principal’s parking space and went in with light heart and a desire to know more about life’s little mysteries.

The entire scene was anticlimactic. The Assistant Principal and the secretaries were a little officious, perhaps, a bit defensive when I asked for a copy of the dress code policy. “Oh, it’s definitely on page four and five of their student handbook, four AND five,” the secretary noted. The AP chimed in, “Oh, yes! And we’ve had them in for workshops on this just recently.” Workshops? Jesus. I braced for the worst, exposed crotches, some grotesque burlesque of adult sexuality in the guise of my little girl.

What came through the door, instead, was my normally fashionable daughter, with a preternaturally fashionable friend, skirts roughly mid thigh or a little lower, blouses balancing lower body skin with upper body modesty. And Jimbo the clown fumbled with half-a-dozen girlfits(just in case), dropping shit all over the floor, agreeing(in spite of my promise to make Casey take all the extras)to return home with the three additional pairs of sweat pants and skirts I’d brought along.

So why write about this, given the lack of fireworks? The rationale is not just that I still find a dress code to be a fancy way of finagling fascist finery into a mundane package. And my reasons certainly don’t encompass belittling anyone as a person---not my estimable daughter, nor her friends, nor any of the educational heroes doing their best to make sense of things like ?skirts that reach the ends of your fingers” handed down from somewhere on high. And clearly I have no high moral ground to occupy in relation to this incident as such, although the maddening inefficient foolishness of the occasion is some ineffable combination of crazed and bizarre and hilarious and horrible.

The reason I write is more about how things are interconnecting these days. My friend Rick has a ‘dress code’ that reflects his DUI conviction when he does community service. I saw no less than four people pulled over by police today in what I can’t help but notice as ‘color-code’ violations, “driving while Black” in other words. The students in Birmingham have elicited echoes from every Georgian teenager with whom I’ve spoken over the past week. I am working with half a dozen former high school students now serving HARD prison time, subject to the most severe dress code, not a single one of whom should have served a day in jail.

Thus, as the other dress code fanatics, in Iraq and Korea and the Phillippines are getting fed up with dying for the wealth and convenience of others, and Congress and the Department of Defense prepare new “Universal Service” requirements, no insultingly stupid and indefensible “CODE”, no matter how innocuous, seems safe to ignore or treat with indifference. I say to the students of this country that the time has come to STAND-UP!! If a revolt against a moronic standard of attire helps focus attention, so be it.

One way or another, anyone paying attention sees the tidal swell gathering to sweep over the complacency and foolish arrogant ignorance of this land. Young people have always ended up a leading force in such social concatenations. They will be again. I’ll advise my children accordingly: to pay attention, to get organized, to stand for social and economic democracy and human rights, and to watch their asses. Who knows how this will all pan out? The coming times will likely make any social storm in recent memory pale in comparison.

I CALLED MY EX WHEN I LEFT THE SCHOOL, JUST TO SEE IF CASEY HAD REPORTED IN. SHE HADN’T. I HOPE SHE DID SO THIS AFTERNOON. I FOUND OUT MY SON HAS ALSO HAD ANOTHER LITTLE BRUSH WITH THE AUTHORITIES, THIS ONE MORE SINISTER AND TROUBLING THAN THE LAST. WHAT A CULTURE---OF VIOLENCE, ONE-UP-MANSHIP, POINTLESS BRAG, AND POSING, THAT WE HAVE CREATED.

MORE LATER, AS SURELY AS DAWN FOLLOWS DARK, “LORD WILLING AND THE CREEK DON’T RISE.”

Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Apr 28, 2004
Jimbo,

It baffles me a bit that you would make a point to say this.


It doesn't baffle me that you would point out that there are racists in this country, even in Law Enforcement, not to mention ANY other occupation. To me, I think that is a no-brainer. (I'm sure with all your research, that you wouldn't even be surprised by the idea that there is racism from the black community towards whites as well, and just about any other racial group towards any other racial group) In fact, I can't even in recent memory, recall anyone denying that there's racism in America (but that's not to say anyone hasn't). The point of contention is how prevalent the problem is. In your research, have you quantified this problem?

If you make the general statement that in your opinion racism exists in this country, in your community, I have no problem with that statement. When you assume that every stop you drive by that involves a black male motorist must be a "driving while black" violation, then I take issue. (While that last sentence may seem to be an exaggeration, I'm only extrapolating the idea that on that particular day you seemed to have assumed that all those stops were "color coded" as you put it) It is in my opinion, exaggerating the problem. Had you simply said, "Your right Vern, I have no real idea if those particular stops involved racism." then I would not have pursued this any further.

You set up what debaters call "straw men,"


I know what a straw man argument is. When you state:

I saw no less than four people pulled over by police today in what I can’t help but notice as ‘color-code’ violations, “driving while Black” in other words.


and I call you on it, it's not a straw man argument. I addressed a specific statement you made, and rather admitting that you could have been wrong about those instances, you deflect the argument to your general assumption of how prevalent the problem is. THAT is playing straw man, and NOT addressing the challenge. That statement has nothing to do with theorizing, building blocks of data to establish fact, or anything like that. You stated it as fact from the git-go, and with very little specific data on those incidents. That is not the scientific approach.

even if they adhere to a philosophy as bizarre as the Libertarian.


If you think they are "bizarre" then I'm probably even more bizarre in your book. I'm closer to being an Objectivist. I say closer, because I'm new in studying that philosophy. However, I'm finding I agree with virtually everything I have read so far. Yes, I believe in the idea of rational self-interest, not altruism. Yet, whether or not anyone finds that bizarre is of no consequence to me.

You might likely beat me in chess however. My USCF rating is 1174 and I haven't competed or played in quite a bit.

Vern
on May 03, 2004
Vern, you rascal!!

Multiple intersecting deadlines and the need to deconstruct a disaster or two has precluded me from getting back to you any quicker. I tend to be a reliable correspondent, so, even though you may never see this post, I am responding to you. So saying, I emphasize that I'd guess that at some level, we just disagree. We have different ways of processing reality. That's cool.

What I can't just let pass is intellectual error compounding wrongheaded assertion, 'straw man' argument piled on the smoking heap of the previous similar set of contentions. In your last critique, for example, you assert that what I inserted in my original post in order to enrich the hypotheses that onlookers might advance about SCHOOL ATTACKS ON STUDENTS was instead a simplistic set of ideas about RACISM. The whole idea of RACISM, using that ridiculously nonsensical anti-scientific term, is at best troubling to me. I definitely see an ideology of White Supremacy at work, especially in the South. I would have plenty to say about a notion of Black racism at some other time, since it is even more nonsensical than the understandable use of this terminology to describe current ethnic attitudes in America.

However, the point I'm making is that I WASN'T EVEN TANGENTIALLY MAKING ANY POINTS ABOUT 'RACISM'. The original 8 or 9 lines I wrote began, "I saw no less than four people pulled over by police today in what I can’t help but notice as ‘color-code’ violations, “driving while Black” in other words." Note the words, "WHICH I CAN'T HELP BUT NOTICE." I wrote in this fashion, because I have a testable theory, which many commentators and citizens agree is resonant, and about which many observers have collected evidence, that what I facetiously termed the 'crime' of "DRIVING WHILE BLACK" is both a result of "racial profiling" and a further manifestation of repressive general police policies of the U.S. that have worsened noticeably over the past few years. I THEN CONNECT THIS SOCIAL THEORY---A 'FACTUALIZED' THEORY, IF YOU WILL---WITH A BROADER NOTION OF POLICE ATTACKS ON WIDER AND WIDER SWATHS OF SOCIETY---INCLUDING PROTESTERS AND STUDENTS, ESPECIALLY LOWER INCOME AND ETHNIC STUDENTS. More and more, we live in a police state, in which police abuse is part of a program of protecting us from "terror" by causing terror against us. It has nothing to do with saying individual policemen are bad; it has nothing to do with a general observation about color consciousness, let alone a nimwitted defense of 'racism' as the key concept of social understanding.

The case may be incontrivertible of course that the points I make are bullshit. Who knows? They don't seem like horse manure to me, but they're my points, eh? THE CLUE I HOPE YOU HAVE A GLIMMERING OF RECOGNIZING AT THIS JUNCTURE IS THIS. YOU HAVEN'T YET HAD ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT THE ARGUMENTS I MADE. Instead, you've set up a series of straw men---the first was asserting I had said I had special knowledge of the incidents I noticed as a bypasser and was dishonestly trying to sneak them in of proof of the already factualized theory, about racial profiling and police policy. In your last note, meanwhile, you concoct some fantasy that I was primarily speaking about racism. You first proceeded to destroy the notion that one who hasn't investigated thoroughly can possible know motives and results of arrests, and last suggested that imputing color prejudice especially to police was not a matter that would likely be proveable. Well golly. I've already noted that only an idiot would disagree with the first contention. And, although I believe an imputation of more color consciousness among police might be proveable, AS WITH THE FIRST IDEA, IT WAS NEVER MY POINT.

People who set up and destroy 'straw men' needn't be aware that that is what they are doing. It needn't be a conscious tactic. But conscious or not , that's what you've been doing here, as well as advancing other ideas that to me seem logically, empirically, and analytically suspect. Mostly though, as I suggested at the start, we probably see the world differently. Thus, a long-winded exchange may not offer us much, in the way of new ideas, etc. I allow my own breathy proclivities license here because you continue to take a decrepit horse, beat it to death, and then say you've somehow refuted the entirely different animal about which I've been writing.

In any case, THAT'S MY STORY AND I'M STICKING TO IT!!
on May 03, 2004
THE CLUE I HOPE YOU HAVE A GLIMMERING OF RECOGNIZING AT THIS JUNCTURE IS THIS. YOU HAVEN'T YET HAD ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT THE ARGUMENTS I MADE. Instead, you've set up a series of straw men---the first was asserting I had said I had special knowledge of the incidents I noticed as a bypasser and was dishonestly trying to sneak them in of proof of the already factualized theory, about racial profiling and police policy. In your last note, meanwhile, you concoct some fantasy that I was primarily speaking about racism.


The clue that I hope you can grasp is that I never have yet attempted to address the totality of your post. That is another no brainer. I addressed a specific point you tried (unsuccessfully) to make to as part of your whole argument. I never claimed you had special knowledge, quite the contrary. I asserted that you lacked enough knowledge to make the assumption you made about the four specific instances to which you referred, at least in terms of it being a valid assumption, much less a statement of fact. That discredits it's standing as being usable in the totality of the point your whole post was addressing. When you talk about "driving while black", that is CLEARLY an accusation with racism as it's base (hence the "black" part which is a direct reference to the African American race), and yes, even "remotely tangentally", even though that was not sole intent of your post. Your attempts above to deny that are incredible.

Give the straw man crap a rest. You tried to steer away from the point I made, and would never answer directly if you had specific knowledge as to the true nature of those traffic stops. You made an assumption which you cannot substantiate in those 4 specific examples, but yet you still refuse to acknowledge that.

THAT'S MY STORY AND I'M STICKING TO IT!!


Yes, I'm quite aware of that. That's what makes further argument pointless. You refuse to yield to the logic of my position because it doesn't fit your story.

Your blog, you get the last word, I'm done.

VES

on May 03, 2004
Well, now, Vern!
Would you find it offensive if I called you "a stubborn cuss?" I'm going to post text I first entered a week ago tomorrow. "Just so, as a social epidemiologist---joined by lots of professional and amateur scholars in my endeavors---I note a much higher than expected proportion(it should be 1/5 nationwide, more or less, randomly)of Black faces at traffic stops. I hypothesize that a difference between expected outcome and actual events has something to do with color. I BELIEVE I CAN PROVE IT, NOT IN THE FOUR INSTANCES I WITNESSED LAST WEEK, BUT IN GENERAL." I hope you recognize that I "directly answer" your crazy accusation that I was trying to HIDE my lack of special knowledge, which is in essence an attempt to suggest special knowledge.

The only reason I didn't immediately "admit" what you asked is that my original text made no such assertion as you accuse me of. Since this note on 4/27, I have "directly answered" your point twice more. I NEVER WANTED ANYONE TO THINK I'D INVESTIGATED MY ASSERTION OF 'DRIVING WHILE BLACK' IN THESE CASES.

HMMMMM!!! As to "racism" and my perhaps feeble attempt to articulate what's wrong with the idea---and thus your idea that 'racism' is what I'm talking about---I refer you to my previous note. I'm making a much more general suggestion about police powers, applied for some time now according to a 'color profile,' and now being applied much more generally to folks who the government thinks are bad eggs for one reason or another. I have a hunch, a hypothesis, that this connects to cell phone seizures in schools in various ways. If you don't get that, I certainly apologize for any inability to convey the ideas. I'll be posting more on these notions and you can continue to disagree.

I hope you can see the repeated 'straw-man' arguments you are using to attack me, now using ad-hominem insults as well. If not, ah well; it's no big deal in the scheme of things. Best of luck figuring this all out.

Ciao for now,
Jimbo
3 Pages1 2 3