LitCritShit & PoliticalTheory & MoralPhilosophy & EroticInvestigation & ScientificElucidation & HonestDialog & RealStories & HistoricalMemory & WhotheFuckKnowsWhatAllElse
My Wild Little Girl Gets in Some Trouble
Published on April 21, 2004 By 6969jimbo6969 In Politics

Rise Up Children, Your Parents Will Follow
THE PRISON SYSTEM, THE SCHOOL SYSTEM, THE WHOLE FUCKING SOCIAL SYSTEM IS ROTTEN


This is not the BLOGessay I intended to post. I had a series of four environmental issues and environmental heroes pieces all planned out surrounding Earth Day tomorrow. I nearly posted a similar piece, as this has turned out to be, last week, about unfortunately typical vicious stupidity in Alabama’s schools, as usual promulgated by the State. A Birmingham ‘alternative’ high school saw fit to steal cell phones from over a hundred students, who were minding their own business but breaking a State statute disallowing “ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES” from school grounds. And, thank GOD! fifty or so parents got angry enough about this perfidious brain-dead behavior to demand an accounting. I’m telling you, people will rise up against the BullShit just as likely when the stakes are small as when the issues are huge.

I’ll write more about this when I’ve had a chance to be in communication with some of my Birmingham compadres---a piece about the murderous madness advanced in the name of national security in Anniston was going to be my Alabama entry for the week; it will wait until the morrow. When I saw, Sunday or Monday in the “Times,” that Columbia’s Grad Students intended to strike, along with Ph.d. candidates at half-a-dozen other elitish colleges---where they perform most of the teaching duties but end up paying for it instead of receiving compensation much of the time---that also nearly impelled me to bring forth the B’ham piece, with a different twist. I have a friend about to embark on the long grind at Columbia, either for a Ph.d. in sociology or an MPH; and I teach a motley combination of the college bound, the already-enrolled but textually challenged, and so on. But again I demurred from this inclination.

Today, however, my very own children presented me with irresistible impetus to consider this issue of power and human rights and schooling and education in the context of America coming to pieces and everyone in a bad state of denial about it except the young and the poor, who are about to blow up at the ‘mainstream’ putrefaction that passes for contemplation and analysis about our current pass. Education is an inevitable topic of interest, in that I teach a hundred or so youngsters, primarily Asian American, mostly ESL. Also, my very own precious little gems are in middle school, at that most insane and insanely vulnerable of ages.

I had just finished a report about the Citizen Panel Project(SEE the “Citizen Science Democracy Network” post from a couple weeks back)for a couple of colleagues when I got a call from an unknown number on my cell. It was my daughter. My immediate thought was, “I’ve forgotten another fucking orthodontist appointment!” But no, those always are Mondays, to facilitate my assistance with the toll of that process, toward which I could otherwise afford very little contribution.

“Daddy?” I was spacing, and this sort of call was highly unusual---only the second time. Freak-out or time-for-pride? “A couple of friends and I?” Freak-out, definitely trouble anyway. “We’re in the principal’s office? Cause we wore our dresses too short?” I can’t help myself, I still find the tendency of ‘Valley-Girl’ speak to make everything a question pretty cool. “Daddy?”

I remained silent, lost in several competing thoughts: one of which was that I was going to have to write about this; one of which was relief; one of which was whether my advice had had any impact, about rape and mayhem sometimes coming to girls with a pretense of “tough” and salacious plastered all over the surface; one of which was a memory almost exactly thirty four years old. I stood in front of the podium in Thomas Jefferson’s auditorium, about to deliver a speech, my nerdy-boy longshot race for Student Council President on the line.

I made a presentation that so electrified the crowd, about color equity, student power, and democracy, all wrapped around our right to rid the halls of the noxious, arbitrary, and stupid dress code, that the ovation lasted for five minutes, our staid and stolidly staunch former-coach- principal a shaken man as he tried to quiet the mob that had come to its feet. I swear to God, it could have been exactly thirty-four years ago, definitely a Spring day in 1970, the very notion of the correspondence appealing to my proclivities to produce promising premises about random conjunctions. “Daddy, are you still there?”

“Yeah hon. What do you need?” Again, I can’t help myself, my first inclination is to see what I can do, rather than be stern or tough or whatever else a ‘good’ parent might offer.

She tittered into the phone. “They say we have to get new clothes.” Little Casey, who IS tough, proceeded to launch into detailed descriptions of all the outfits she needed me to retrieve. ‘What?’ I thought. ‘All these young women are my daughter’s diminutive size?’ But my cortex kicked in as well, and I noted I was working, that I could only make the journey when I found an opportune moment to slip away, that this was inconvenient, all the while trying to picture just how slutty in dress and demeanor were my little girl and her friends on a sunny warm Southern Appalachian Wednesday. The quiet laughter continued as I pontificated.

“Listen, you! This is no laughing matter. Breaking the rules has consequences.” The laughter stopped, and a sober eleven year old spoke, not only for my benefit but for another, silent, watcher at her end of the line. “I know it’s ‘no laughing matter.’ PLEASE, daddy!”

She had told me to use the spare key to get into their beautiful new home. Stories geyser to the surface as I think about my ex and her husband and my children and their new life, which grew out of the crazy coming together of me and their lion-hearted mother, our joining about as unlikely as any possible configuration of Montague and Capulet imagineable. All of this will spill out, given time enough and tide. But not today, obviously.

I told my Executive Director, for one vector of writing projects I manage and assist, about the deal, and he growled fiercely, as is his wont. But his logic was impeccable when he asked, finally, “What ya gonna do?” and let me go.

Their mom had told me of one such trek, when my son had the temerity, definitely more pointedly than appropriate given his age and her lack of brainpower, to insult his English teacher’s choice of George Bush for President. “It’s just like when you were ten!” And my pounding heart definitely thundered away when I came up to the school. The trouble is, I had no experience of this sort of thing, but for the bizarre forgery incident in sixth grade, just after I had moved to Texas(more later), and I hadn’t done anything then, so I was much more akin, in the event, to Billy Budd than to Tom Sawyer or Becky Thatcher.

I have, of late, through no special virtue or course of work on my part, somehow come to a very peaceful and powerful place in my life. Thundering cardiology notwithstanding, I knew I would remain equable, that I would be firm but open with my child, that I would ask for documentation from the authorities. I parked in the Principal’s parking space and went in with light heart and a desire to know more about life’s little mysteries.

The entire scene was anticlimactic. The Assistant Principal and the secretaries were a little officious, perhaps, a bit defensive when I asked for a copy of the dress code policy. “Oh, it’s definitely on page four and five of their student handbook, four AND five,” the secretary noted. The AP chimed in, “Oh, yes! And we’ve had them in for workshops on this just recently.” Workshops? Jesus. I braced for the worst, exposed crotches, some grotesque burlesque of adult sexuality in the guise of my little girl.

What came through the door, instead, was my normally fashionable daughter, with a preternaturally fashionable friend, skirts roughly mid thigh or a little lower, blouses balancing lower body skin with upper body modesty. And Jimbo the clown fumbled with half-a-dozen girlfits(just in case), dropping shit all over the floor, agreeing(in spite of my promise to make Casey take all the extras)to return home with the three additional pairs of sweat pants and skirts I’d brought along.

So why write about this, given the lack of fireworks? The rationale is not just that I still find a dress code to be a fancy way of finagling fascist finery into a mundane package. And my reasons certainly don’t encompass belittling anyone as a person---not my estimable daughter, nor her friends, nor any of the educational heroes doing their best to make sense of things like ?skirts that reach the ends of your fingers” handed down from somewhere on high. And clearly I have no high moral ground to occupy in relation to this incident as such, although the maddening inefficient foolishness of the occasion is some ineffable combination of crazed and bizarre and hilarious and horrible.

The reason I write is more about how things are interconnecting these days. My friend Rick has a ‘dress code’ that reflects his DUI conviction when he does community service. I saw no less than four people pulled over by police today in what I can’t help but notice as ‘color-code’ violations, “driving while Black” in other words. The students in Birmingham have elicited echoes from every Georgian teenager with whom I’ve spoken over the past week. I am working with half a dozen former high school students now serving HARD prison time, subject to the most severe dress code, not a single one of whom should have served a day in jail.

Thus, as the other dress code fanatics, in Iraq and Korea and the Phillippines are getting fed up with dying for the wealth and convenience of others, and Congress and the Department of Defense prepare new “Universal Service” requirements, no insultingly stupid and indefensible “CODE”, no matter how innocuous, seems safe to ignore or treat with indifference. I say to the students of this country that the time has come to STAND-UP!! If a revolt against a moronic standard of attire helps focus attention, so be it.

One way or another, anyone paying attention sees the tidal swell gathering to sweep over the complacency and foolish arrogant ignorance of this land. Young people have always ended up a leading force in such social concatenations. They will be again. I’ll advise my children accordingly: to pay attention, to get organized, to stand for social and economic democracy and human rights, and to watch their asses. Who knows how this will all pan out? The coming times will likely make any social storm in recent memory pale in comparison.

I CALLED MY EX WHEN I LEFT THE SCHOOL, JUST TO SEE IF CASEY HAD REPORTED IN. SHE HADN’T. I HOPE SHE DID SO THIS AFTERNOON. I FOUND OUT MY SON HAS ALSO HAD ANOTHER LITTLE BRUSH WITH THE AUTHORITIES, THIS ONE MORE SINISTER AND TROUBLING THAN THE LAST. WHAT A CULTURE---OF VIOLENCE, ONE-UP-MANSHIP, POINTLESS BRAG, AND POSING, THAT WE HAVE CREATED.

MORE LATER, AS SURELY AS DAWN FOLLOWS DARK, “LORD WILLING AND THE CREEK DON’T RISE.”

Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Apr 26, 2004
"Do you know how pedophiles think? Provocative dress sets them off. Big time. "

As the mother of a child who was abused from the ages of three to six, let me just say that is a huge load of BS! My daughter was not dressed provocatively at those ages....so it was not provocative dress that set off her molester, nor is that what sets off MOST child molesters/abusers/pedophiles....they are SICK, they have an unnatural attraction to young children that has NOTHING to do with what they wear.

You need to not confuse the issues of appropriate dress for young people with the mental problems of pedophiles.

"I don't blame victims for their crimes, the blame lies with the offender"

Unfortunately, your statement I quoted first DOES blame the victim....it's no different than saying that by dressing a certain way, a woman ASKS to be raped.....

on Apr 26, 2004
I agree with Poetmom99. It is victim completely blaming . Will you next be saying that diaper commercials are provocative?
The college girls in my town go topless all summer, and believe me, that is not an invitation to be touched.
on Apr 26, 2004
The crisis in education today is among the most---and may be the most---profound crisis in our society. It is a crisis, however, not of curricula or reading material, but a spiritual and political crisis that has to do, in my estimation, with willful ignorance and greedy self-righteousness, on the one hand, confronting hopelessness and cynicism on the other.
I certainly agree that American education is in trouble. I have been teaching English in the public schools since 1975, and I truly love the job. However, I sometimes get the sense that I am working on the Titanic... I can love what I do and work as hard as I want, but the whole operation is sinking nonetheless.

In my mind, the number one cause of this is best understood by reading Marshall McLuhan. We are exiting a long era when the printed page dominated the communication of most people. The printed page developed habits of thought which were conducive to "school thinking": long attention spans, language-centered thought, a habit of logical analysis and reflection, etc.

The screen era which now dominates the communication of most people encourages habits of thought hostile to school thinking: short attention spans: image-centered thought; an impatience with ideas and abstractions and reflection; and a general view that entertainment is the number one value in life.

This trend does not bode well for the future of academic achievement, and schools have been slowly strangling on the problem for many decades. To simplify ridiculously, there seem to be two philosophies regarding how this should be dealt with: 1) Uphold standards by administering stern discipline and demanding exams. 2) Find new ways to teach that better reach today's kids (that is, children raised on visual media).

After many years of watching very talented and well meaning people pursue these two lines of thought, I now sincerely believe that both paths are essentially hopeless. I hate to go to into this in detail, given the subject of the thread, but the the simple explanation is this: One cannot bring about academic achievement in a vacuum. Given that very little of the public, very few parents, very few successful job-holders in the community -- heck, very few teachers -- reflect the intellectual habits of the printed page era, it is expecting an impossibility to think that students will magically do so in our schools.

The result is that almost every serious conversation about schools gets sidetracked onto non-academic matters. Students should be made to dress more appropriately, or they should be allowed more freedom. They should be made to be more respectful, or they should be allowed to question authority. They should be forced to pray in school, or they should be forbidden to pray in school.

The conversation turns to these things because these are non-academic matters that people still feel passionately about. Grades and diplomas -- mere shadows of actual learning -- provoke lukewarm discussion. Talk about the details of history, language, or the sciences, and eyes quickly glaze over.

Thus my flip comment above: If only America could get as worked up over students' reading, writing, math, history, and critical thinking as they do about petty rules.

on Apr 26, 2004
Don!

Please, in the future, when you present ultra-compelling and interesting analysis, just for my sake if not for the sake of anyone else, please give one reason to feel optimism is something other than a fool's errand. Present a 'one-chance-in-a-million' scenario. I haven't been teaching in the public schools that long; in '75 I was still an undergraduate, but I've been teaching off and on since 1978, here and there, as one way to support my writing habit. And I certainly can IMAGINE developments in which human blossoming, social democracy, and sustainable ecology could coincide.

Your 'flip comment' is appropos in context. What to do then? Go down with the ship? Build a life raft? Invent a time machine? Surely there must be some room in your heart for a network of actors who might manage to make a difference, even against the heavy odds you outline so well. I for one long for discussion and action in just that regard.

Thanks for taking the time to explain.
on Apr 26, 2004
To deny the existence of this difference looks suspiciously like denial or insanity to me.


To presume that complaints equal actual difference instead of perceptual difference without knowing specific facts sounds like prejudice or insanity to me. I don't always take the word of my friends as gospel because I know when compared to my observations that aren't always factual. Friends ( even innumerable, which suggests an even less lofty value of the concept of friends ) do not automatically imply credibility.

When you saw the four people pulled over on the traffic stops, how much more information did you have beyond there was a police officer and a black motorist? Were you driving by and that represents the only snapshot you have of the situation? Did you stop at each instance and inquire further what the pretense of the stop was for? Did you observe the operation of each of these vehicles and not see any violation committed? Were you in a predominently black neighborhood where most of the people traveling in that area would be black? In other words, in those particular instances of "color coding", how much were you assuming? How much direct knowledge did you have of those specific instances? How much did you investigate to verify your assumptions?

VES
on Apr 26, 2004
PoetMom and WiseFawn!!

Remind me, if I ever happen to disagree with you(could that ever happen? LOL), not to be a sexist idiot. I shudder to think of the bloody pulp of putrefaction you'd make of me. Sometimes, I like to think that men can write about anything with as much authority as a woman. You have humbled me and corrected my hubris. Thanks for paying attention and putting things in a much clearer and more useful way than I was able to do.
on Apr 27, 2004
Vernon,

You're a 'just the facts, ma'am' kind of guy perhaps. That is fine. I'm presenting facts, facts of a certain sort. The arguments you use would deny the applicability of a science like epidemiology, which looks at broad patterns in order to deduce links and causation, in order to come up with resonant hypothesis.

For better or for worse---and I understand your skepticism and disposition to disagree, which are both fine, since I am of the mindset that there are things about which reasonable people can differ---I am engaged in a process of SOCIAL epidemiology, as a sort of complement to the medical variety. A medical epidemiologist might observe a lot of cancers near a chemical plant. The owners of the plant migh shout and growl, but given enough correspondence, we needn't prove that every case of bladder cancer definitely comes from the plan. The link is scientifically valid in general. Just so, as a social epidemiologist---joined by lots of professional and amateur scholars in my endeavors---I note a much higher than expected proportion(it should be 1/5 nationwide, more or less, randomly)of Black faces at traffic stops. I hypothesize that a difference between expected outcome and actula events has something to do with color. I believe I can prove it, not in the four instances I witnessed last week, but in general.

Thus, what seems like denial or retardation to me is the unwillingness to acknowledge that the disparity exists, in the rate of African Americans being stopped by police, versus their portion of the driving population. I wish you all the best, and you could have a better approach to life. I haven't a fucking clue half the time. But your approach, in many people I've dealt with, has ended up being a cover for self-serving self-righteousness. You don't sound like such a person, but I just don't much care to play in that sandbox, with all your mates who are, thank you very much.

Best of luck,

Ciao for now,

Jimbo

on Apr 27, 2004
You know, sometimes common sense and living in the world is enough. It might be 2004, but we seem to not only be going backward in some cases, but in other cases, we just stayed still. Even in our controlled media, it is pretty much accepted that certain people are singled out. I had thought that attitudes were changing a bit towards the poor, for example, since so many were joining the ranks of the poor. But I found I was very wrong as soon as I started writing about poverty on here. Stigma and prejudice are very much alive and well in America. You don't need stats, you have eyes. And I don't mean that in an offensive way.
on Apr 27, 2004
Jimbo,

You didn't answer any of my questions, but I could have "deduced" the answers to begin with. You don't have any more specific knowledge than having just driven by, and that in your mind is enough to assume the police officers were racists. Each individual situation DESERVES to be reviewed on it's own merit. You are engaging in the very behavior that you allege to be trying to expose.

Yes, I'm into facts, because facts establish what's real. Subjectivity and assumptions ATTEMPT to distort reality. I say ATTEMPT, because actual reality cannot be distorted by what we think.

Let's assume for a moment that their were (at least) 8 individuals involved in the 4 traffic stops, 4 cops, 4 motorists. You are perfectly willing to make prejudiced assumptions about 4 of the individuals involved, and then decry those individuals for making prejudiced assumptions of the other 4 people.

I won't belabor this any further. I think I have, with your help, adequately established my point.

Vern

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. - Ayn Rand

on Apr 27, 2004
please give one reason to feel optimism is something other than a fool's errand. Present a 'one-chance-in-a-million' scenario.
Thank you for the compliment in your message.

As to optimism, I think that a look into the future always appears gloomy. For example, if five years ago, I had seen into the future and seen that my father would get sick and die, and that I would undergo cancer surgery, I would have felt nothing but gloom. Yet here I am in 2004 living a happy life and pretty much adjusted to these negative events.

The same, I suspect, is true about our culture. If you or I could jump into a time machine and look ahead, our 2004 selves might be very unhappy with what we would see. However, that doesn't mean humans (including ourselves, if we are still around) won't be happy in that future.

In fact, that was pretty much Marshall McLuhan's message. He pointed out that the invention of the alphabet and, later, the invention of the printing press were both pretty upsetting events. Those who lived through those changes in dominant media saw their most cherished ideals and institutions crumble, yet few would argue that we ought to turn back the clock on those advances. He thought the same would prove to be the case, eventually, about the coming of the screen era.

Further, who is to say what forms the screen will eventually take. Most of the effects that I described are primarily due to television. But television's time of dominance may be fleeting, and computers, for example, may have quite a different effect.

None of this is to say I believe that schools will survive in anything more than name, but that does not mean that human life is about to become unbearable.

on Apr 27, 2004
WiseFawn!
I feel so lucky to have the virtual privelege of your acquaintance. The notion of "heart" is an easy one to discount. I certainly have never attempted a scientific explanation, which is important, as science is a necessary component of conversation that's worth a damn. But you so powerfully manifest this quality, of love and center and common sense, that I call "heart." Thank you. My call to all who feel such is to listen to the words of Jackson Brown and "in our hearts turn to each others' hearts for refuge," in these troubled days, "before the deluge" or whatever miracle is coming down the pike instead!

I also call for action as well as words. I look forward to opportunities in that regard at some point.
on Apr 27, 2004
Vern, Vern, Vern!!
I'd love to play chess with you. Our styles are dialectically opposed and yet similar somehow too. I thought I'd made clear the answers to your queries, in stating that I was a mere passer-by. When I reviewed your list, though---thank you!---I noticed one that did NOT ask for essentially the same info. I was in every case in predominantly White neighborhoods, going to and from my daughter's school and to the program where I teach.

As to the content of your post, of course identifiably distinct interactions must "be judged on their own merits." It baffles me a bit that you would make a point to say this. I have noticed this pattern in your posts. You set up what debaters call "straw men," ideas that I have not stated nor would I defend, and then you demonstrate that to hold these opinions is very, VERY BAD!!! And who could disagree. Not me.

Then you ignore the substance of what may be meaningful and important in my work and suggest you've disprove THAT on the basis of having utterly destroyed your straw man. That's not a problem, but I am hopeful that readers will see what is afoot and reach conclusions formally similar to what you suggest at the end of your post, but with a 180 degree different conclusion attached.

You may have no interest in recognizing that you have missed my point, but I can't help myself. I'd like to point it out. The idea, again, is at the center of much of empirical science, such as epidemiology, social psychology, quantum mechanics, among other areas of importance. This is the notion---and there are plenty of thinkers who say it applies universally to science; if you're interested, I can dig out a citation to an Einstein essay that is interesting---that the universe reveals itself to us, not bit by bit(or case by case, if you prefer), but in many instances as an aggregate of experience. This is NOT to say that understanding and truth come from the 'big picture,' but that our best approach to trial and error is to START from here---as I said, many thinkers allege that almost everyone DOES work this way, even if they adhere to a philosophy as bizarre as the Libertarian.

This means that theory and theorizing are part of making things factual, not that theory and theorizing mean an abandonment of the facts. As I have made clear, I assert that I can demonstrate---for a majority of listeners, readers, watchers, thinkers, doers, that in the case at hand, I have a proveable hypothesis: That there is a Police Industrial Complex that divides and conquers through selective arrest and prosecution constantly, moreso in the US than some other places, but world wide to some extent, at this point. I have alot more to contend and develop, but as I say I've collected evidence, researched evidence, analysis, and opinion, and generally participated in these matters for decades. More than a few cops call themselves good friends of mine, and I find that an honor.

Anyhow, it's a big topic and a big world. You come and visit whenever you like, and I appreciate your insights, questions, and ideas.
on Apr 27, 2004
Don Bemont for Chief Guru!
Hope that's not ecumenically offensive. The tenor and quality of your observations are pretty incredible. What an amazing 'correspondence committee' happenstance. I can't help myself, I'm an activist. I know that it's all hopeless and futile, but for whatever this glorious instant holds---attachment kills, etc.---and nonetheless I call all people of good heart and inquiring mind to find a way to connect and converse and dance our ways to a transformative paradigm for human survival via a pathway of integration with life and the cosmos. I don't have answers, necessarily, but I have some damn fine questions along with the necessary good heart and inquiring mind. Should you ever like, I'm at freebird6969@mac.com, always interested in collaborative conversations, etc.

Again, thanks for your rare intelligence, calm, and quiet mirth.
on Apr 28, 2004
Alright, I'm a student, and I can tell you the REAL problems going on in school. Here it is: the idiots have taken over. No longer are teachers allowed to discipline students as freely as they used to be. I've heard of cases where teachers got in trouble for suspending students! That, my online companions, is downright, grade-A bullshit. Students aren't at school to have fun or enjoy themselves, it's for the learning goddamnit. Everyday I waste at least 20 minutes in each of my classes listening to my classmates chew the fat. The teacher tries to calm the kids down but they just start talking as soon as it's quiet. And I'm a senior! Students shouldn't have rights, because they are not mature enough for the responsibilities that come along with them. Dress codes are good because they prevent provocative/vulgar clothing from being worn to school! And I for one like that!
on Apr 28, 2004
Hey Plaps,
Thanks for offering your perspectives, from a grassroots birds-eye view. I too have experienced education from every possible angle, as well as done my best to study things, talk to people, listen to people, watch and cogitate. You know what cogitate means right? As I would say to my students, "five letter word, starts with 't', ends in 'k'". Anyhow, your input helps in that regard.

However, for me, as analysis or the basis for sound policy, your thinking leaves a lot to be desired. It would take a LOT of time and energy to show you all the errors of your ways, and I'm willing to do that, should you show a willingness after checking out a little of my attenuated response. You know what "attentuated" means, right? Five letter word, starts with 'b', ends with 'f'. Basically, you almost constantly assume your premise, what folks occasionally call begging the question. And, as well, your reasoning is rife with conclusions where you think that because two phenomena you observe occur at the same time, the cause of one is automatically the presence of the other, and of course right in the direction of your personal prejudice. How convenient.

First of all, we should note that we both agree that public schools are intolerably fucked up. I believe that I can demonstrate that the problems which define this crisis are uniformly the result of either policy or neglect, or a policy of neglect, instead of due to a lack of discipline at the same time that gestapo of various sorts wander school halls throughout the nation. A related idea you advance, "Students aren't in school to have fun or enjoy themselves, it's for the learning, Goddamnit"---which is a run-on sentence by the by my young friend---I find almost impossibly tragic. We live to "have fun and enjoy ourselves." If you really believe otherwise, why bother. Joy and friendship and love and compassion and contribution and exercise and learning ALL interconnect in any but the most hideously stupid(and I guarantee you, historically short-lived)societies.

Finally, regarding dress codes, I like your conclusion: "I for one like that." You seem to evince(look it up!)a certain democratic spirit with that idea. Let's let the parents and the students and everyone involved VOTE, or is democracy too dangerous for students and schools? That would certainly be an interesting notion, one with which I would never agree, nor would my kiddos, either biological or ontological. Best of luck,

Ciao for now,
Jimbo
3 Pages1 2 3